The whacky web site of Andrew Drummond

Anybody who knows me will know I have been involved in a two year battle with a convicted criminal journalist called Andrew Drummond.

I have recently been following the antics and the comments on Drummond's web site and the articles seem to become more desperate and bizarre every day.

I have been following the site for a reason, and Drummond will receive the documents from Bangkok Southern Criminal Court in due course.

Drummond as a result of writing inaccurate articles was convicted in Pattaya Provincial Criminal Court  in February 2014 by David Hanks and Drew Noyes . Drummond was then convicted again by the Supreme Court of Thailand on 27th October 2014 in a case brought by James Lumsden.

In the Lumsden case the Supreme Court of Thailand the Court found that Drummond had made wild unsubstantiated allegations that were both false and defamatory. The case related to an article in 'Bangkok Post'. The newspaper settled out of Court.

Drummond also currently faces three inquiries by the UK Press Complaints Commission (now the Independent Press Standards Organisation 'IPSO').

Drummond uses electronically altered photos - which is forbidden by all credible press standards of ethics.

Drummond has already been indicted in case number 8368/2556 and case 1327/2557 in Pattaya and three criminal cases in Koh Samui numbers 1246/2556, 1269/2556 and 1826/2556. If convicted on all cases Drummond faces the real prospect of a custodial jail sentence in Thailand.

In the last 6 weeks traffic to Drummond's site has fallen by 65%.

The most vociferous commenter and  poster on Drummonds site goes by the fake name Tommy Weapon. Tommy is too pathetic to use his real name or a real photo.

Tommy Weapon tells everybody he is a big man in Thailand. Actually he is a worthless low life. He tells tales of being in Thailand many years.

Actually Tommy's real name is Keith - yes Keith we have traced your computer records via a firm of forensic investigators, and some documents are coming your way.

Along with another pathetic paedophile who goes by the name Sam Thai who claims to have been in Thailand many years - yet does not speak a word of Thai as he found out to his cost during a crank call he made to me :)

Tommy and Sam are ardent followers of convicted criminal Andrew Drummond.

Both Tommy Weapon and Sam Thai are  on the run and are wanted for jointly anally raping a ten year old boy.

Tommy and Sam are also friends with Ian Charles Tracey (or Tracy) another convicted paedophile who supports Drummond ( you can Google the filthy pervert Tracey) who was convicted of paying a 14 year old boy to perform oral sex on him!

Oh  by the way - just for you Sam : ไอ้สัส ไอ้เหี้ย ไอ้สาละเลว ไอ้น่าหีควาย ไอ้ควยเอ๋ย มึงน่าจะไปหากระโปร่งใส่ก่อนน่ะ สัส

Tommy can tell you what it means.

Pattaya, 29th May 2014

I recently posted a story about an English expat Ian Charles Tracey, who was released from Nong Palai prison in January 2014.

Ian Charles Tracey - Sentenced to 4 years for child sex charges

I have been accused by journalist and convicted criminal Andrew Drummond of having 'set up' Ian Tracey - which as  will be revealed in this post is utter drivel.

Andrew Drummond is a convicted criminal, having been sentenced to four months jail in February 2014 at Pattaya Provincial Criminal Court in case number 9819/2555.

Andrew Drummond - Journalist and Convicted Criminal

The previous story on this subject is at this link Ian Charles Tracey .

Immediately after I posted I was subjected to a vile attack by Ian Tracey in which he said he would sue me, and called me various names - sticks and stones.

I can however now reveal that sources at the Supreme Court of Thailand have revealed that Ian Tracey has not yet been fully cleared - he has been released on bail pending review of his case by the Supreme Court - his conviction and jail sentence handed down on 14th January 2011 for child sex abuse charges remains in place.

At this time, contrary to reports by Andrew Drummond that he has been 'cleared' or 'falsely accused', Ian Tracey is  at this time a convicted criminal, having been convicted of child sex abuse charges by the Region 2 Court of Appeal on 14th January 2011.

Sources at the Supreme Court today confirmed it could easily be another two years or more before a final judgement is handed down in this case, but in the meantime Ian Tracey is on bail awaiting the outcome of his appeal.

The news that Tracey is merely on bail awaiting appeal is not exactly what was reported by Andrew Drummond.

Following Tracey's threat to sue, it is clearly in the public interest that the true facts of his release are revealed.

Ian Tracey was originally arrested during Operation Naga in May 2008, and was found not guilty at the Court of First Instance.

Ian Charles Tracey pictured at the time of his arrest in May 2008

Tracey's original arrest was reported in the Pattaya Mail in May 2008.

His arrest in 2012 was reported on Pattaya One  and Thai Visa.

On 14th January 2011, the Region 2 Court of Appeal reversed the decision of the lower Court finding :

'The witness and evidences presented by the Defendant lack sufficient weight to disprove the Prosecutor’s evidences.

 Therefore, the Court of Appeals, Region 2 does not agree with the judgment of the Court of First Instant and the Prosecutor’s appeals sound reasonable.

The Court hereby revises the judgment and issues an Order that the Defendant is guilty pursuant to Criminal Code Section 277 first paragraph, Section 283bis, second paragraph, one offense against several provisions of law pursuant to Criminal Code, Section 277, first paragraph, the Section with the severest punishment under the Criminal Code Section 90, and now sentences him to a term of 4 years' .

Note : A copy of the judgement in Thai and an English Translation is reproduced at the foot of this post.

Tracey's arrest in 2012 was reported on Pattaya One  and Thai Visa.

Three separate reports filed by Andrew Drummond appeared in the UK in The Daily Telegraph and The Daily Mail, with a further report in Thailand in The Chiang Rai Times, and of course a much different version appeared on Drummond's web site, basically blaming me for Tracey's incarceration - utter drivel.

What is important to note in all of these articles is there is no mention that Ian Tracey is merely on bail awaiting a decision of the Supreme Court and that his conviction for child sex abuse currently stands - the quote from Drummond is :

'Ian Charles Tracy, 47, from Godalming, Surrey, was let free from Nong Plalai Prison in the eastern resort of Pattaya, where he spent 14 months of his sentence treated as a child sex abuser.'

It may have been more appropriate to write:

'Ian Charles Tracy, 47, from Godalming, Surrey, was released on bail let free  from Nong Plalai Prison pending review of his case by the Supreme Court of Thailand. 

Tracey is now in the eastern resort of Pattaya, where he spent 14 months of his sentence treated as a child sex abuser.

If Tracey's appeal to the Supreme Court is successful he will be finally cleared, and if not could be returned to Nong Palai Prison to serve the remaining two and a half years of his sentence'.

Prior to Ian Tracey being released on bail from Nong Palai, Drummond previously said of him in two stories :

From Drummond's site on 3rd September 2013 :

'Last week Thai police found a wanted child abuser hiding in a room below Goldie's in the ‘Jaggy Thistle’ – the registered office of Goldie’s firm Alba Law.
Londoner Ian Charles Tracy, 47, had been on the run on for nearly a year on charges of abusing two boys aged 10 and 12, in Pattaya. Not only was Tracy living on the same premises as Goldie but witnesses say he had actually helped Goldie acquire the bar in the first place.
Tracy had little visible means of support in Pattaya, which is as famous for its young ‘boy bars’ as well as its thriving heterosexual sex scene. He earned pocket money making such things as steak and kidney and chicken pies and selling them to British run bars.

Arrest warrant Issued

Ian Tracey - Arrest Warrant

The Region 2 Court of Appeal issued an arrest warrant in July 2011 when Tracey failed to appear at Court - Tracey later filed documents with the Court to show he had not received the documents.

The full decision of the Court of Appeal is published at the bottom of this page (now with English Translation).

The warrant for Tracey's arrest (above) was issued a year before I knew him - some set up!

I helped Ian Tracey find a lawyer for his case and the lawyer lodged the documents with the Court of Appeal - he has been released now. I am not clear on whether or not Ian Tracey's conviction has been quashed, or he remains convicted of child sexual abuse offences and has been released on on bail pending appeal.

The appeal and request for bail was lodged free of charge.

Gregory Miller - sentenced to 38 years in jail for the serial rape of a 9 year old boy.

Comment : 

If Ian Tracey had not launched his personal attack on me I would have assumed that his conviction had been queshed and he was a free man. 

I am at a loss to know why Andrew Drummond has not reported that Tracey is merely on bail pending appeal.

Tracey was arrested as a result of the lawful order of a Thai Court with an arrest warrant properly issued according to Thai law.

It is not for me or Andrew Drummond to comment on the guilt or innocence of Mr Tracey, or to comment on his pending appeal to the Supreme Court.

Ian Tracey had been advised to surrender to the Court, and if he had done so he may have been granted bail - he chose not to do so despite being fully aware of the warrant for his arrest.

At the time he was arrested he was being followed by Thai police and had been under surveillance since the time of the arrest of Tracey's close friend Greg Miller - he had been warned of this by his own 'contact' in the Thai government.

Greg Miller was jailed in November of 2013 at Pattaya Provincial Court after pleading guilty to the serial rape of a nine year old boy.

TRANSLATION

(OFFICIAL EMBLEM)

For Court Use
O (Or.2)

Judgment Black Case No. 739/2552

Red Case No.45/2554

In the Name of His Majesty the King

The Court of Appeals, Region 2

Date: 14 January 2011

Criminal Case

Public Attorney, Office of the Attorney-General - Pattaya……...........................Prosecutor
Between
Mr. John or Tracey Ian Charles ……………….………………………….…… Defendant

Subject: Rape, Sexual Abuse, Sexual Offence

The Prosecutor filed Appeal against the Court’s judgment Pattaya Provincial Court Dated 25 December 2008 Court of Appeals, Region 2 Dated 24 March 2009

The Prosecutor filed charges saying that on 15 May 2008 during night time before midnight, the Defendant had taken Master Ninthawat Chaemchan, about 14 years of age, to commit indecent acts under the damaged person’s consent. The Defendant had abused the damaged person by inserted the Defendant’s sexual organ into the damaged person’s mouth, pushed and pulled for several times and requested the damaged person to hold the Defendant’s sexual organ by hand to slide it back and forth for several times under the damaged person’s consent.

The incident took place in Nong Prue Sub-district, Bang Lamung District, Chon Buri Province, thus may the Court mete out punishment pursuant to Criminal Code, Sections 91, 277, 283bis.

The Defendant denied the charges.

After due consideration, the Court of First Instant dismissed the charges.

The Prosecutor filed appeals.

The Court of Appeals, Region 2 has verified the statements, held meeting for discussions and foundout facts at this stage, without the litigant’s argument, which could be settled about the damaged person.

Master Ninthawat Chaemchan, born on 26 October 1993, about 14 years of age, that on 19 May 2008, Pol.Sen. Sgt. Maj. Sompong Srisunthon together with officers from “Child Protection and Development Center” had brought the said child to file a complaint to the Investigative Officers for legal action against the Defendant. On 26 May 2008, the damaged person testified, before the Investigative Officer and the public attorney including the social officers, according to the Memorandum of Testimony given by the damaged person as per Exhibit Jor.6. Later, Pol. Sgt. Maj. Uthen Srisamut had obtained from the Court the Warrant of Arrest and the Search Warrant according to copy of Warrant of Arrest and Search Warrant as per Exhibits Jor.2 and Jor.3, and headed to arrest the Defendant at House No.44/97, Sap Sombat Village, Nong Prue Sub-district, Bang Lamung District, Chon Buri Province.

The Defendant denied the charges according to the Memorandum of Arrest as per Exhibit Jor.4. This case has problems that need determination as to whether or not the Defendant had committed the offence according to the Prosecutor’s appeals.

The Prosecutor having the damaged person come to testify that before the incidenttook place, the damaged person was residing with his friend at Suni Lane, without any guardian to take care of him. The damaged person was residing with his friend, Master Bang. The damaged person confirmed that the person shown in the photo as per Exhibit Jor.5 is Mr. Ian, called by the damaged person as Mr. Marijuana (Kancha) and confirmed that Mr. Ian was the Defendant who sits in the court’s room. Initially, the damaged person’s friend introduced him to the Defendant and advised the damaged person to ask for money from the Defendant, whereby the Defendant gave the damaged person Baht 100 each time of request. The Defendant has never requested the damaged person to perform oral sex for him. However, if the damaged person provided sexual service, he would receive Baht 500 - 1,000 each time of service. However, the reason why the damaged person testified that he performed oral sex for the Defendant was due to he was instructed by the Tourist Police who threatened to sent him to stay at the Juvenile Observation and Protection Center for 10 years, but thedamaged person did not tell the officer of “Child Protection and Development Center”, who were there at thetime, that he was threatened by the Tourist Police and the damaged person pointed out the Defendant’s housedue to received money from the officer of “Child Protection and Development Center”.

The damaged person knew the Defendant, but had never performed oral sex for him. However, the Police Officer requested the damaged person to testify during the investigation stage that the Defendant asked him to perform oral sex. In fact the Defendant had never requested the damaged person to perform oral sex for the Defendant and now the damaged person has testified as such voluntarily without threat or coerce from any person, at the Office of Attorney General, Pattaya Province, in front of the Investigative Officers and the Officers of “Child Protection and Development Center”. The Social Officer had read out the Memorandum of Testimony as per Exhibit Jor.6 to the damaged person who confirmed it to be true only on the part mentioned that the damaged person was in the Defendant’s house and the damaged person had privately invented the story of sexual abuse by himself. While in the Office of Attorney General, Pattaya Province, the InvestigativeOfficer showed the photocopy of the Defendant’s Passport to the damaged person who confirmed that Mr.John and Mr. Ian are different persons.

On the date that the damaged person was in the Court, he wasaccompanied by a lawyer who was working for the Office of the Defendant’s advocate. Pol. Sen. Sgt. Maj. Somphong testified as a witness that at the time of incident, he was working at the Tourist Police Division of Pattaya City and was assigned by his superior to investigate into the matter of foreigner and child sexual abuse.

On 18 May 2008, the witness met the damaged person who informed him that a foreigner namely, Mr. John whose surname was unknown, had led the damaged person to Sap Sombat Village, Village No.9, Nong Prue Sub-district, Bang Lamung District, Chon Buri Province, and then Mr. John asked the damaged person to perform oral sex for him. Therefore, the witness reported it to his superior who in turn asked him to bring the damaged person to file a complaint to the Investigative Officer at the Pattaya Police Station. The witness set off with officials of “Child Protection and Development Center” to see the damaged person, a child without guardian, residing in area of Suni Lane, inside VC Pattaya Lane, where Pol. Lt. Col. Prachuap Sentha, Investigative Officer, testified that on 19 May 2008, Pol. Sen. Sgt. Maj. Somphong together with officers from “Child Protection and Development Center” has brought the said child tofile a complaint to the Investigative Officer saying that on 15 May 2008 at approx. 20:00 hours, the damagedperson was led by a foreigner, whose actual name was unknown and nickname “John” unknown surname, to hishouse in Sap Sombat Village, Village No.9, Nong Prue Sub-district, Bang Lamung District, Chon Buri Province.

Then, Mr. John asked the damaged person to perform oral sex for him. Hence the witness has compiled theevidences and asked for Warrant of Arrest, from Pattaya Provincial Court, to arrest Mr. John. The witness hadinquired the damaged person and found out that before the damaged person went to see Mr. John, the damagedperson was contacted by Master Bang to provide sexual service for Mr. John - unknown surname, residing in Sap Sombat Village, for sexual service at the wage of 1,500 baht per service. Later, the damaged person wentto Sap Sombat Village and met Mr. John who asked the damaged person to perform oral sex for him.

Subsequently, on 19 May 2008, the Officer of Tourist Police Division, jointly arrested the Defendant and delivered him to the witness, who had inquired the damaged person at Pattaya Office of Attorney General, jointly with the Public Attorney and the Officers of “Child Protection and Development Center”.

During the nterrogation process, the witness showed the Defendant’s photo to the damaged person who confirmed that theperson in the photo, as per Exhibit Jor.5, was Mr. John - unknown surname, who asked the damaged person toperform oral sex for him. It could be seen that the incident that gave rise to such investigation and the arrest ofthe Defendant was based on Pol. Sen. Sgt. Maj. Somphong’s testimonies that the witness hadinquired the damaged person who told him that Mr. John - unknown surname, a foreigner had asked the damaged person to perform oral sex for him at Sap Sombat Village, Village No.9, Nong Prue Sub-district, Bang Lamung District, Chon Buri Province. However, after the witness had inquired the damaged person,later the damaged person replied to the cross-examining questions of the Defendant’s lawyer that it was due to the Police Officer had arrested the damaged person for urine test to find out narcotic substances and he was asked by the Police Officer as to whether or not he had been sexually abused by any foreigner, hence the damaged person informed the Police Officer about the said incident. After that, the Police Officer had conducted investigations and asked for the Court’s Warrant of Arrest to arrest the Defendant on 19 May 2008.

Later, on 26 May 2008, after the Defendant was being arrested for 7 days, the Investigative Officer had inquired the damaged person in front of the public attorney and the social officer, whereby the  damaged person testified at the interrogation stage about the occurrence of the incidents in sequence order which sounds reasonable.

It began with Mr. Bang persuasion to provide sexual services to foreigner, until achieve orgasm either orally or manually, in exchange for wages. Later, the damaged person and Master Bang visited House No.44/97, Sap Sombat Village, Nong Prue Sub-district, Bang Lamung District, Chon Buri Province, and met a foreign man with tall and thin figure, sharp eyes and prominent nose, white complex and blond hair. Master Bang called him briefly as “John”, who was then mixing marijuana with cigarette for smoking. Later, Mr. Johngave money to Master Bang to buy marijuana and Mr. John led the damaged person to his bedroom on the 2nd floor, turned on the Video, showing to the damaged person, the intercourse between a man and a woman.

Later, Mr. John took off his Jean pants and shirt and lay on his back on a bed and asked the damaged person to take off his own clothes. Mr. John, who did not wear any condom to cover his sexual organ, asked the damaged person to perform oral sex and used his hand to hold Mr. John’s sexual organ. During this time, Mr. John would like to use a chain to link the boy arms, but the boy refused.

The damaged person performed oral sex for Mr. John, push and pull for several time alternately with using his hand to hold Mr. John’s sexual organ to slide up and down for several times, total 1 hour until reached orgasm, and Mr. John gave 1,500 Baht to the damaged person. After Master Bang returned, the damaged person together with Master Bang left the house. This is sound reasonable without conflict against natural facts and it was told while the damaged person was unprepared and had no chance to alter the facts to assist or blame anyone. Furthermore, the said fact was privately known by the person in actions and difficult to invent such story by himself, thus it can be believed that at the Investigation stage, the damaged person had testified in front of the Investigative Officers, public attorney and social officers, in truth according to the experiences he really gone through. At the time of the Defendant’s arrest, the damaged person looked at Mr. Tracy’s photo and confirmed that the man and Mr. John is the same person.

However, later during the hearing process, when the Prosecutor asked the damaged person to look at the Defendant’s photo as per Exhibit Jor.5, but the damaged person testified that the man in the photo was Mr. “Ian” or the person called by the damaged person as Mr. Marijuana (Kancha) was the Defendant. Even though his later testified that Mr. John and Mr. Ian are different person and the damaged person did not perform oral sex for the Defendant and he had to testify in the beginning according the Tourist Police’s advice, or else he would be sent to the Juvenile Protection Center for 10 years, which deemed as unreasonable testimonies given to deviate the facts. The damaged person’s testimony during the investigation stages was truer to the facts than during the Court’s hearing. Even though the damaged person had claimed that the foreigner’s name “John” was not his actual name, but this is a normal since majority of child sexual offenders often concealed their actual names and surnames to prevent lawsuits. The fact is when the house of incident, that the damaged person had testified and confirmed to the Investigation Official, was visited by the Police Officers with Warrant of Arrest and Search Warrant, it was found out that the Defendant was the only one foreign man living in the house, therefore, it can be truly believed that Mr. John who abused the damaged person on the date of incident and at the house of incident, was Mr. Tracey Ian Charles - the Defendant. It is deemed that the evidences presented by the Prosecutor were linking more reasonably to the facts, thus the weight thereof is sufficient to believe without doubt that on the date and at the place of incident as sued, the Defendant had asked the damaged person to perform oral sex for the Defendant, which was a sexual abuse against the damaged person, hence the Defendant’s act was an offence against law as charged.

Regarding the Defendant’s evidence that on the date of incident he was teaching English at Pattaya Operate Foundation from 17:00 until 18:00 hours, and from 18:10 hours, the Defendant took his rented motorbike to return to the shop where it was rented according to the copy of Motorbike Lease Contract as per Exhibit No. Lor.1. Later, the Defendant went to Outback Bear Bar and sat there until about 22:00 hours and then traveled to stay at Thap Thongkham Hotel in Ayanyaprathet District, Sra Kaeo Province, according to the copy of documents issued by Aranyaprathet Border Checkpoint as per Exhibit Lor.2. However, the Defendant has no witness or evidences to clearly and accurately identify that on the date of incident, the Defendant was teaching English at the said foundation and his Motorbike Lease Contract was only for 4 days commencing from 31 March 2008 and valid until 4 April 2008, that was about 1 month before the date of incident while the evidence of motorbike return showed that it was returned and accepted on 28 May 2008, which was after the date of incident, not on the incident date as claimed by the Defendant. Furthermore, Miss Chanida Chompattana had testified as the Defendant’s witness that on the incident date, about 18:00 hours, the Defendant was sitting in her bar, where the witness was working and supervising the bar. The Defendant was sitting there until 24:00 hours. Before leaving the bar, the Defendant said he was going to renew his Visa at Aranyaprathet, but the Defendant brought no suitcase and carried no extra clothes for changes while staying at the said hotel. This is contradicted against reasons because if the Defendant was leaving for the said hotel in Sra Kaeo Province, a long distance away, the Defendant should not come to sit at the bar from 18:00 until 24:00 hours and then traveled after midnight, this also contracted against proper reasons.

The witness and evidences presented by the Defendant lack sufficient weight to disprove the Prosecutor’s evidences.

Therefore, the Court of Appeals, Region 2 does not agree with the judgment of the Court of First Instant and the Prosecutor’s appeals sound reasonable.

The Court hereby revises the judgment and issues an Order that the Defendant is guilty pursuant to Criminal Code Section 277 first paragraph, Section 283bis, second paragraph, one offense against several provisions of law pursuant to Criminal Code, Section 277, first paragraph, the Section with the severest punishment under the Criminal Code Section 90, and now sentences him to a term of 4 years.

Mr. Wichian Boranwat                   -Signature-
Mr. Rakkiat Watthanaphong       -Signature-                                        (Court Seal Affixed)
Mr. Thanakhom Limphakdi          -Signature

Exposing Andrew Drummond's Lies - Ian Tracey

Most readers of this blog know that I am involved in extensive litigation with Andrew Drummond, a journalist resident in Bangkok.

Andrew Drummond is a convicted criminal, after being convicted of the criminal defamation of  Drew Noyes and David Hanks in Pattaya earlier this year. Drummond was sentenced to four months in jail (suspended for one year).

Andrew Drummond - A convicted Criminal

I have been reading Drummond's blog and copying URL's for the last three days (the reason will become clear to the entire world on Monday May 26th).

I have noted many inaccuracies, as well as outright lies. I intend to address the inaccuracies and outright lies in this blog.

Every time I expose Drummond as a liar, he writes about me again - he cant do any more damage and as far as I am concerned can now write as many times as he wants - there is however a very nasty surprise in store for him and a number of other individuals who comment on his site, and use Google profiles to do so.

Earlier this year Drummond reported on his site that I 'set up' a man called Ian Charles Tracey.

Ian Tracey - Jailed for Child Sex Abuse by Appeal Court then released by Supreme Court

Ian Charles Tracey was convicted of child sexual abuse offences by Rayong Court of Appeal in approximately September of 2010,  and was arrested as a result of a warrant issued by Rayong Court of Appeal.

Ian Tracey's Arrest Warrant - issued 14th September 2011

The Court of Appeal issued the warrant when Tracey failed to appear at Court - Tracey later told the Court he had not received the documents.

The full decision of the Court of Appeal is published at the bottom of this page.

The warrant for Tracey's arrest was issued a year before I knew him - some set up!

I helped Ian Tracey find a lawyer for his case and the lawyer lodged the documents with the Court of Appeal - he has been released now. I am not clear on whether or not Ian Tracey's conviction has been quashed, or he remains convicted of child sexual abuse offences and has been released on on bail pending appeal.

The appeal and request for bail was lodged free of charge.

Drummond previously said of Tracey in two stories :

From Drummond's site on 3rd September 2013 :

'Last week Thai police found a wanted child abuser hiding in a room below Goldie's in the ‘Jaggy Thistle’ – the registered office of Goldie’s firm Alba Law.

Londoner Ian Charles Tracy, 47, had been on the run on for nearly a year on charges of abusing two boys aged 10 and 12, in Pattaya. Not only was Tracy living on the same premises as Goldie but witnesses say he had actually helped Goldie acquire the bar in the first place.

Tracy had little visible means of support in Pattaya, which is as famous for its young ‘boy bars’ as well as its thriving heterosexual sex scene. He earned pocket money making such things as steak and kidney and chicken pies and selling them to British run bars.

But he also had a voluntary role visiting foreigners in the local prison at Nong Plalai just outside Pattaya and reported back to Consulates – including the British one – on their condition and complaints.

He said he worked for a local children's charity ‘The Mercy Centre’, a fact that is unlikely to be confirmed'

Tracey has now gone from 'wanted child abuser' and 'on the run' to 'victim' - unbeleievable!

Comment : 

Tracey was jailed as a result of the lawful order of a Thai Court with an arrest warrant properly issued according to Thai law.

It is not for me or Andrew Drummond to comment on the guilt or innocence of Mr Tracey.

He had been advised to surrender to the Court, and if he had done so he may have been granted bail - he chose not to do so despite being fully aware of the warrant for his arrest.

At the time he was arrested he was being followed by Thai police and had been under surveillance since the time of the arrest of Tracey's close friend Greg Miller - he had been warned of this by his own 'contact' in the Thai government.

Greg Miller was jailed in November of 2013 at Pattaya Provincial Court after pleading guilty to the serial rape of a nine year old boy.

Brian Goudie - My fight with Andrew Drummond

Well, well, well here we are back for New Year - only the Second of January and the drivel has started already.

Brian Goudie

In a year where I have been attacked relentlessly by a 'journalist' - Andrew Drummond - a man who seems to have to constantly u-turn when he finds out what he wrote before was absolute drivel.

So for the first time I will come out on this blog and I will say it - Andrew Drummond writes tabloid trash and lies - what he does not know he just makes up, and I can prove it!

Here are the lies - any statement Andrew Drummond can prove is not a fabrication by him I will retract. Fair?

1. About me.

That I have been on the run from a criminal case in my home country of Scotland for twenty years, and an arrest warrant 'expired' - the truth is the case was dismissed in 1998. Documents from Scottish Authorities have been provided to Pattaya Court, the case has been finished for 15 years.

Comment : There never has been an arrest warrant in Scotland, this case has long since been dismissed, the story written by Drummond is a complete fabrication.

UPDATE : He wrote it again - there is no warrant - oh too hard, Andrew make it easy - post a copy! Forget the AAT, you know that was dismissed by the Court of Appeal, so no point in going over that old one again.

Brian Goudie - with my passport.

2. About me

That my passport was 'seized' by Pattaya Court in November 2013 - absolute nonsense, yet even when asked to correct it Drummond refuses.

I even provided Drummond with a dated photo of me with my passport.

Comment : My passport is with me and always has been - the story of the seizure of my passport is a complete fabricaton.

Gregory James Miller

3. About Greg Miller

Drummond reports I was a 'paedos lawyer' in the case of Greg Miller, in fact the lawyer was Sanya Namnaphon = Miller pleaded guilty on ten charges of child abuse and got 38 years - harsh yes, but he had a team of Thai lawyers advising him - nothing to do with me!

Comment : Mrs Miller has actually told the Court we never lied to her, and we hope we can talk to Mrs Miller in Court this month to resolve this case.

UPDATE : This case is to be sent to the Region 2 Court of Appeal for review of a 'serious legal error'.

John Jepson

4.About John Jepson

 Drummond reports I defrauded a man called John Jepson - John  Jepson has never paid me a single penny - in fact he has borrowed more than USD 100,000 from me so he could pay off his mortgage - I cant wait for this to come to Court!

Jepson was represented by no less than three highly qualified Thai lawyers - and never paid a penny.  I paid all of Jepson's bills and paid his mortgage of USD 100,000.

Interestingly Jepson is suing me, but not the legal company he has a contract with.

Comment : Mr Jepson is in for a few nasty surprises as we have uncovered evidence of the real reason he is suing in this case.

Ian Tracey at his arrest - in the street, not in a room!

5. About Ian Tracey

Drummond reports that I 'set up' a man called Ian Tracey - Ian Tracey was arrested as a result of a warrant issued by Rayong Court of Appeal in a case where the Court had sent documents to the wrong address!

The warrant for Tracey's arrest was issued two years before I knew him - some set up!

I helped Ian Tracey find a lawyer and the lawyer lodged the documents with the Court of Appeal - he has been released now - but I am still wrong. Drummond previously said of Tracey in two stories :

From Drummond's site on 3rd September 2013 :

'Last week Thai police found a wanted child abuser hiding in a room below Goldie's in the ‘Jaggy Thistle’ – the registered office of Goldie’s firm Alba Law.

Londoner Ian Charles Tracy, 47, had been on the run on for nearly a year on charges of abusing two boys aged 10 and 12, in Pattaya. Not only was Tracy living on the same premises as Goldie but witnesses say he had actually helped Goldie acquire the bar in the first place.

Tracy had little visible means of support in Pattaya, which is as famous for its young ‘boy bars’ as well as its thriving heterosexual sex scene. He earned pocket money making such things as steak and kidney and chicken pies and selling them to British run bars.

But he also had a voluntary role visiting foreigners in the local prison at Nong Plalai just outside Pattaya and reported back to Consulates – including the British one – on their condition and complaints.

He said he worked for a local children's charity ‘The Mercy Centre’, a fact that is unlikely to be confirmed'

Comment : Tracey has now gone from 'wanted child abuser' and 'on the run' to 'victim' - unbeleievable! Tracey was jailed as a result of the lawful order of a Thai Court, and at the time he was arrested was being followed by Thai police and had been under surveillance since the time of the arrest of Greg Miller - he had been warned of this by his own 'contact' in the Thai govenment.

From Drummond's site on 1st May 2013:

'Last year Pattaya Police arrested Briton Ian Tracy at the premises of Brian Goudie formerly known as the 'Jaggy Thistle' now the Paradise Bar in Jomtien Complex, Jomtien, Chonburi. Tracy a former prison visitor for the 'Mercy Centre' is alleged to have also found clients in the prison for Goudie in particular the man Goudie speaks abouthere. Tracy is doing four years for child abuse. In this photo Tracy is giving the finger while Goudie remains in the background'

From Drummond's site on 2nd January 2014:

'Goudie’s former girlfriend and assistant B K (sic Boonrod Baikrathok) confirmed that Goudie had called police in Banglamuang to report Ian Tracy’s presence at the Jaggy Thistle. She added that this occurred after Mrs. Barbara Fanelli Miller had left the premises to return to the United States.'

Comment: Tracey was arrested in August 2013, a fact confirmed by Drummond own story quoted above on 3rd September 2013, therefore was arrested at least three months before Miller returned to the USA - another fabrication!  Miller was there on the day of the arrest!

And B K (Boonrod Baikrathok) was the person who went to the Court to get the documents for Tracey, and was the one always in touch with Thai police! Tracey even gave her a power of attorney.

6. About Nattasuda 'Neung' Sripawit

Drummond says there are photos of me on social network sites with my ex-girlfriend Nattasuda 'Neung' Sripawit.

Drummond previously referred to her as being a p*****te - you cant get much lower than calling someone that. Now he wants to champion her cause.

Neung and I have had our differences, but I would never do anything to harm her or her reputation. Neung is a fantastic girl, just has had a few 'blips' in her path, but if she ever needs anything she knows who to ask.

Neung has posted photos on Facebook, as have I - so what! I also have Flickr and Picasa and there are photos there of me and Neung. The photos were posted when we were together! They are ours, we are entitled to post them!

Drummond has reposted many of the photos on his site illegally and without permission and they have got into search engines - he forgets to mention that of course!

Comment : I previously used Facebook, Google and various other sites under my old email address Ram****@gmail.com, but all of these accounts were compromised in June of this year when three of my computers and backup drives were stolen from my office along with a large number of personal photographs, videos and documents - many of these photos that were on my stolen computers now appear on Andrew Drummond's site - you ask the question!

7. About Boonrod Baikrathok

Drummond quotes on 2nd January 2014:

'Since she (Nang) had turned against Goudie (right) she has been the subject of a vicious campaign on the internet where personal and intimate pictures have been posted of her on a blogspot site and a Google+ site.'

Nang now has at least two cases to face in Court, and has already been convicted and sentenced in another case in September this year in Pattaya Court (nothing to do with me and boy was that kept quiet).

I saw some photos of Nang on the net last month, but they were certainly not pornographic, and I actually discussed it with several people last month as I had seen these photos before and did not know how they could have possibly come to be on the net - then I remembered my stolen computers (see above).

In fact, the only photo of Nang that I have (above) I got from the net - it has been on Drummond's site, and a number of other sites.

Comment : I previously used Facebook, Google and various other sites under my old email address Ram****@gmail.com, but all of these accounts were compromised in June of this year when three os my computers and backup drives were stolen from my office along with a large number of personal photographs, videos and documents - many of these photos now appear on Andrew Drummond's site - you ask the question!

There may be some photos of Nang out there, and I was alerted to them but the computers have been out of my control since June 16th, and the premises ransacked in mid July - all reported to police.

8. Fake Profiles and Social Networking

Over the last two months I have been in constant contact with Google, Facebook, Flickr, Youtube, Yahoo, Bing and a number of other sites.

Only last week, I had two fake profiles removed about me, one from Google and the other from Facebook. This follows other profiles removed previously. A number of removals are now pending.

Only last week nineteen (19) videos were removed from Youtube, see here : 

Brian Goudie and David Hanks force Youtube to remove videos.

There are so many profiles that have been set up using my name,  but are posting fake photoshopped images - images that had previously appeared on Andrew Drummond's site, and then these images were reposted on Google, Facebook, Flickr, Youtube, etc. Fortunately, lawyers have sourced the original copyrighted images before being photoshopped and this has been reported to their owners.

I have identified at least ten fake profiles in Google, all of which post comments on Drummond's site, and these fake profiles have been posting and reposting these images all over the net. Some of the profiles have now been deleted, and Google's legal department in California are now involved.

The difficulty is, according to the internet lawyers we are using in the US, that it is near impossible to track the source of these fake profiles, who the person is, where they live, or even what computer they use - and the source of the photos may never be known.

Google have told our lawyers they just cant tell us who is doing this, and they cant stop it - Google do not ask for ID when a profile is made and dont check names - so 'The Weapon' 'Tommy Truthsearcher' 'Horse Doctor' have all slipped through the net, however, all of this has now been reported to the Royal Thai Police - in fact only yesterday the first case was accepted and is reported on Case Watch Thailand here:

Andrew Drummond and Dr. Mike Goulet reported to Police.

In the New Year, myself David Hanks and Drew Noyes intend to file cases against Google, Yahoo, Bing (Microsoft Search), and a number of individuals. We have already identified at least three web sites in Thailand that will be receiving summonses to appear in Criminal Court very shortly.

Google have been advised as follows:

'In some case the same false allegations have been repeated up to thirty times over 58 URL's, all on the same site.

The repeated publication of false and defamatory material is unlawful in the UK pursuant to the Defamation Act 1996 and the Malicious Communications Act 1998.

The use of copyright photographs taken from 'Facebook' is a criminal offence against the Copyright Act.

The hosting of a site that permits an ongoing campaign of internet harassment on a Google server is contrary to the following laws:

U.S.C. ¤ 875(c) – This deals with threats to kidnap or harm people. It was amended to include threats via computer networks.

47 USC sec. 223. – This deals with cyberstalking, which typically does not include an overt threat of kidnapping or harm.

18 USC § 1361-2, – This prohibits malicious mischief'


.................the ongoing campaign of internet harassment is being undertaken with the sole purpose of creating irreperable reputational damage, but also demonstres that is it being undertaken maliciously, and explains why the same false allegations are repeated time and time again, and why fake photoshopped images designed to embarrass and humiliate are being posted repetitively to ensure the images are refreshed constantly and are often name differently on different URL's to ensure the same images appears in search results on more than one occassion.'

Comment : I previously used Facebook, Google and various other sites under my old email address Ram****@gmail.com, but all of these accounts were compromised in June of this year when three of my computers and backup drives were stolen from my office along with a large number of personal photographs, videos and documents - many of these photos now appear on Andrew Drummond's site - you ask the question! 

Google, Facebook, Flickr, Yahoo, Youtube are just so dangerous as they permit fake profiles to be set up - the stupid thing is they only ask for proof of ID when you want to take it down - doesn't help me much as Drummond has posted my passport on his site so anybody can use it!